Question:
I know Adkins considers a carb a carb, no matter if a complex carb or simple carb. However, if you combine and cook the carbs, does it alter them? In other words if you have 4 carbs from one ingredient and 4 carbs from another ingredient, does it indeed equal 8 carbs or do other things happen. Do the fat or protein grams ever convert themselves to carbs? If I have 8 carbs and 4 fat grams will combining and cooking the ingredients change anything? Thanks, Anon
Response:
Are you going, or have you ever gone to any type of educational institution? — JC Eat less, exercise more. —
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I know Adkins considers a carb a carb, no matter if a complex carb or simple carb. However, if you combine and cook the carbs, does it alter them? In other words if you have 4 carbs from one ingredient and 4 carbs from another ingredient, does it indeed equal 8 carbs or do other things happen. Do the fat or protein grams ever convert themselves to carbs? If I have 8 carbs and 4 fat grams will combining and cooking the ingredients change anything? Thanks, Anon
Response:
Ok.. I will pass along the standard replies: Read the book It’s A*T*kins.. And what JC said.. go to school and learn basic math. Teeb
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I know Adkins considers a carb a carb, no matter if a complex carb or simple carb. However, if you combine and cook the carbs, does it alter them? In other words if you have 4 carbs from one ingredient and 4 carbs from another ingredient, does it indeed equal 8 carbs or do other things happen. Do the fat or protein grams ever convert themselves to carbs? If I have 8 carbs and 4 fat grams will combining and cooking the ingredients change anything? Thanks, Anon
Response:
I know Adkins considers a carb a carb, no matter if a complex carb or simple carb. However, if you combine and cook the carbs, does it alter them? In other words if you have 4 carbs from one ingredient and 4 carbs from another ingredient, does it indeed equal 8 carbs or do other things happen.
If you add beano to mashed veggies, fiber will decrease and carbs increase (though I have no reason to believe that the net effect is more than negligible). If you let the pot sit for a while, microbeasties will consume the carbs. If the result is wine, vinegar, or yogurt, that could still be a good thing. Some uncooked beans contain rather nasty protective chemicals, which if not properly cooked can eliminate most carbs consumed in the same meal, but not in desirable ways. Other than that, not, particularly. Do the fat or protein grams ever convert themselves to carbs?
Not usually. If I have 8 carbs and 4 fat grams will combining and cooking the ingredients change anything?
Presumably, your spoonful of fat will crisp-tender your 8 carbs of cruciferous vegetables to a perfect turn. If not, you’re not doing it right. Other than throwing part of the food away, nothing people ordinarily do in kitchens (except for the microbeasties part, above) will affect basic nutritional values. Martin 215/167/165 since April 2004 — Martin Golding | I cook, therefore I am. You eat. DoD #236 BMWMOA #55952 SMTC #2 | What’s THAT supposed to prove?
Response:
No, cooking doesn’t change carbs, proteins or fats into each other. Common misconceptions occur when newbies look at carb counters, because a cup of cooked vegetables often contains two or three times as much as would fit in the cup when they were raw. I know Adkins considers a carb a carb, no matter if a complex carb or simple carb. However, if you combine and cook the carbs, does it alter them? In other words if you have 4 carbs from one ingredient and 4 carbs from another ingredient, does it indeed equal 8 carbs or do other things happen. Do the fat or protein grams ever convert themselves to carbs? If I have 8 carbs and 4 fat grams will combining and cooking the ingredients change anything?
– "There’s a seeker born every minute."
Response:
Are you going, or have you ever gone to any type of educational institution?
Oh, so you were also wondering who "Adkins" is? ;-) — jmk in NC
Response:
I know Adkins considers a carb a carb, no matter if a complex carb or simple carb. However, if you combine and cook the carbs, does it alter them? In other words if you have 4 carbs from one ingredient and 4 carbs from another ingredient, does it indeed equal 8 carbs or do other things happen. If you add beano to mashed veggies, fiber will decrease and carbs increase (though I have no reason to believe that the net effect is more than negligible).
Beano is an enzyme from Aspergillis niger (IIRC) that converts oligosaccharides into digestible sugars. So the fiber goes down *significantly* and the carbs are likewise increased. You don’t have to add it to the veggies. Taking a few drops with the first mouthful of the offending veggies will take care of the whole batch you consume. If you let the pot sit for a while, microbeasties will consume the carbs.
Fermentation is not to be encouraged in the home kitchen. <g If the result is wine, vinegar, or yogurt, that could still be a good thing. Some uncooked beans contain rather nasty protective chemicals, which if not properly cooked can eliminate most carbs consumed in the same meal, but not in desirable ways.
Some uncooked beans harbor enough natural insecticides and other chemicals to make them worth a second thought if consumed regularly. Other than that, not, particularly. Do the fat or protein grams ever convert themselves to carbs? Not usually.
No. If I have 8 carbs and 4 fat grams will combining and cooking the ingredients change anything? Presumably, your spoonful of fat will crisp-tender your 8 carbs of cruciferous vegetables to a perfect turn. If not, you’re not doing it right.
"Right" is in the eye of the masticator. Or mouth. Or something. Other than throwing part of the food away, nothing people ordinarily do in kitchens (except for the microbeasties part, above) will affect basic nutritional values.
Exactly so. Pastorio
Response:
Fermentation is not to be encouraged in the home kitchen. <g
My mileage varies. I make bread and cheese now and plan to make wine and vinegar in the near future.
Response:
I know Adkins considers a carb a carb, no matter if a complex carb or simple carb.
You might know that but that doesn’t make it true. 20 grams via a Snickers bar is absolutely not the same as 20 grams via a bucket sized helping of broccoli. As the gram counts, though, it is the total grams that are used. However, if you combine and cook the carbs, does it alter them?
The carb count is not reduced in any way. In fact fiber is changed into digestible carbs to some extent so the carb count can go up. In other words if you have 4 carbs from one ingredient and 4 carbs from another ingredient, does it indeed equal 8 carbs or do other things happen.
Yes, 4 + 4 does in fact equal 8. Do the fat or protein grams ever convert themselves to carbs?
After digestion, inside the body, eventually yes. Especially in the case of prtotein that’s why Atkins is high-fat, medium-protein and low-carb. Excess protein gets converted to carbs to burn it, 50ish% efficiency.
Response:
Fermentation is not to be encouraged in the home kitchen. <g My mileage varies.
<LOL Doesn’t everybody’s. I make bread
Did some today as an experiment and for a piece I’m writing. Tried a funny retro (50’s as far as we can tell) baking device I just got from someone online. It’s called a "Bake-A-Round" and it’s a Pyrex tube about 4-inches in diameter and maybe 14-inches long. Comes with a carry-rack. Made bread dough and let it rise once. Punched it down, shaped it, put it into the tube to rise a second time. Baked it. Lovely. Crisp crust (I expected soft because of the semi-enclosure). Made a more conventional-shaped loaf in a ceramic bread pan. Also lovely. and cheese
Depending on the cheese. Most aren’t fermented, just curdled with rennet or acids. and plan to make wine
No question there. What sorts of wine are you talking about? Made how? and vinegar in the near future.
Vinegar is a very different process than bread or wine. Different critters. Acetobacters rather than yeast. I live in the south. Fermentation at home has some cultural implications that run afoul of several government agencies. It’s good not to annoy them. Making these sorts of foods at home have been startling experiences for me. Seeing how different the commercial versions are. My daughter today said that she’s spoiled for "store bread." Bob
Response:
Fermentation is not to be encouraged in the home kitchen. <g My mileage varies. I make bread [...] and cheese Depending on the cheese. Most aren’t fermented, just curdled with rennet or acids.
I’m not sure I’d agree with that. Certainly swiss and cheddar (and cheddars many relatives) are fermented. If one strikes the all-chemical-all-the-time sludges, I’d argue that IS most cheese. I live in the south. Fermentation at home has some cultural implications that run afoul of several government agencies. It’s good not to annoy them.
While I can understand YOUR reticence, being a highly trained professional, us amateurs are perfectly content to consume the entire production our own selves. You know that you can brew or vint pretty much to your heart’s content, right? Don’t sell or concentrate any, of course. On the other hand, there are satisfactory Argentinian and Australian wines that are cheaper than I’ve been able to find bulk wine grapes. Martin — Martin Golding | Anyone who eats three meals a day should understand DoD #236 | why cookbooks outsell sex books three to one.
Response:
and cheese Depending on the cheese. Most aren’t fermented, just curdled with rennet or acids.
Yup. I made my simplest recipe alst night, it’s being pressed as I type. Ingredients are milk, apple cider vinegar and salt. and plan to make wine No question there. What sorts of wine are you talking about? Made how?
The simplest recipe I have found basically involves letting a mixture of fruit and honey rot. ;) I have some brandy recipes to try too. Same basic idea, starting with fruit. Im a homesteading type, my basic notion is to learn how to make everything from scratch. and vinegar in the near future. Vinegar is a very different process than bread or wine. Different critters. Acetobacters rather than yeast. I live in the south. Fermentation at home has some cultural implications that run afoul of several government agencies. It’s good not to annoy them.
*Fermentation* does? Or distillation? I think I’m missing something. Making these sorts of foods at home have been startling experiences for me. Seeing how different the commercial versions are. My daughter today said that she’s spoiled for "store bread."
Yeah, we have lost our taste for pre-packaged junk too. And most restraunts have become disappointing as well you "remember" the food as being good, but when you atually eat there, it’s not. The vast majority of the time, I end up thinking, "We should’ve just eaten at home." Since I am occassionally too busy or lazy to cook, I tend to keep leftovers in the fridge, and make big pots of stuff to can and freeze, so we always have some "fast food" without having to actually eat stuff that sucks.
Response:
The simplest recipe I have found basically involves letting a mixture of fruit and honey rot. ;)
Mmm, methilgil mead. I live in the south. Fermentation at home has some cultural implications that run afoul of several government agencies. It’s good not to annoy them. *Fermentation* does? Or distillation?
Distillation is regulated on a federal level. Making homebrew fermented products for personal consumption is or can be regulated at state level. Every state I’ve checked allows brewing more mead, beer or wine for myself than I could possibly drink but i’ve only looked it up in a few states. But if you make brandy, be sure not to mention it here when it’s done.
Response:
Homebrewing is NOT regulated by states. The Fed handles the manufacture, regulation and labeling of alcohol-based products. One person can brew up to 100 gallons. A family, no more than 200. Doesn’t matter what state your in. You can thank Jimmy Carter for allowing homebrewing. That’s a lot of brewing.
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The simplest recipe I have found basically involves letting a mixture of fruit and honey rot. ;) Mmm, methilgil mead. I live in the south. Fermentation at home has some cultural implications that run afoul of several government agencies. It’s good not to annoy them. *Fermentation* does? Or distillation? Distillation is regulated on a federal level. Making homebrew fermented products for personal consumption is or can be regulated at state level. Every state I’ve checked allows brewing more mead, beer or wine for myself than I could possibly drink but i’ve only looked it up in a few states. But if you make brandy, be sure not to mention it here when it’s done.
Response:
Beano is an enzyme that allows the body to process sugars that are otherwise indigestible to humans. The sugars are capable of being used by intestinal flora (bacteria) just fine, which produces the "gas" you wish to avoid. To combat the problem they give you the enzyme so you can digest the sugar and thus reduce the amount available for the bacteria to eat "down the road" so to speak. Certain vegetables also have the problem of causing gas for the same reasons. I am not cartain how many more carbs one would have to account for by adding a product like beano to the food before eating, but I would make a guess that they are already accounted for since the sugars are not "fiber" in the sense of roughage used to keep yourself regular. One trick I learned a while back (before LC’ing) to encourage micro-organisms to "eat" the indigestible sugars in beans (before they got in me) was to add yeast to the soaking water, and keep the water at a temperature that would support yeast growth. Yeast seem to love those sugars since I rarely had problems with beans after doing that. Just be sure to change the water when you are ready to cook with the beans to avoid any unpleasant taste from the yeast. Of course I will have to wait a while to enjoy beans again since I am still in Induction, but I hope to be in OWL soon. I know I posted a lot of info that maybe no one needed, but I thought it might be helpful to some out there.
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I know Adkins considers a carb a carb, no matter if a complex carb or simple carb. However, if you combine and cook the carbs, does it alter them? In other words if you have 4 carbs from one ingredient and 4 carbs from another ingredient, does it indeed equal 8 carbs or do other things happen. If you add beano to mashed veggies, fiber will decrease and carbs increase (though I have no reason to believe that the net effect is more than negligible). If you let the pot sit for a while, microbeasties will consume the carbs. If the result is wine, vinegar, or yogurt, that could still be a good thing. Some uncooked beans contain rather nasty protective chemicals, which if not properly cooked can eliminate most carbs consumed in the same meal, but not in desirable ways. Other than that, not, particularly. Do the fat or protein grams ever convert themselves to carbs? Not usually. If I have 8 carbs and 4 fat grams will combining and cooking the ingredients change anything? Presumably, your spoonful of fat will crisp-tender your 8 carbs of cruciferous vegetables to a perfect turn. If not, you’re not doing it right. Other than throwing part of the food away, nothing people ordinarily do in kitchens (except for the microbeasties part, above) will affect basic nutritional values. Martin 215/167/165 since April 2004 — Martin Golding | I cook, therefore I am. You eat. DoD #236 BMWMOA #55952 SMTC #2 | What’s THAT supposed to prove?
Response:
Beano is an enzyme that allows the body to process sugars that are otherwise indigestible to humans. The sugars are capable of being used by intestinal flora (bacteria) just fine, which produces the "gas" you wish to avoid. To combat the problem they give you the enzyme so you can digest the sugar and thus reduce the amount available for the bacteria to eat "down the road" so to speak. Certain vegetables also have the problem of causing gas for the same reasons. I am not cartain how many more carbs one would have to account for by adding a product like beano to the food before eating, but I would make a guess that they are already accounted for since the sugars are not "fiber" in the sense of roughage used to keep yourself regular.
Interesting question. The indigestible part of the veggies is largely oligosaccharides which we can’t digest but can be, as you point out, be digested by bacteria. Given that nutritional labeling doesn’t break them out, I’d bet that in the USDA nutrient database, they’re just lumped into the carb category. Not all fiber is "roughage." I still don’t get why they’d call pectin "fiber," but that’s how it’s labeled and described by FDA and USDA. It’s a "soluble fiber" as opposed to the bulk that is roughage. One trick I learned a while back (before LC’ing) to encourage micro-organisms to "eat" the indigestible sugars in beans (before they got in me) was to add yeast to the soaking water, and keep the water at a temperature that would support yeast growth. Yeast seem to love those sugars since I rarely had problems with beans after doing that. Just be sure to change the water when you are ready to cook with the beans to avoid any unpleasant taste from the yeast. Of course I will have to wait a while to enjoy beans again since I am still in Induction, but I hope to be in OWL soon. I know I posted a lot of info that maybe no one needed, but I thought it might be helpful to some out there.
Never heard of this yeast technique. Interesting. Got some new questions to ask around the lab. Bob – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I know Adkins considers a carb a carb, no matter if a complex carb or simple carb. However, if you combine and cook the carbs, does it alter them? In other words if you have 4 carbs from one ingredient and 4 carbs from another ingredient, does it indeed equal 8 carbs or do other things happen. If you add beano to mashed veggies, fiber will decrease and carbs increase (though I have no reason to believe that the net effect is more than negligible). If you let the pot sit for a while, microbeasties will consume the carbs. If the result is wine, vinegar, or yogurt, that could still be a good thing. Some uncooked beans contain rather nasty protective chemicals, which if not properly cooked can eliminate most carbs consumed in the same meal, but not in desirable ways. Other than that, not, particularly. Do the fat or protein grams ever convert themselves to carbs? Not usually. If I have 8 carbs and 4 fat grams will combining and cooking the ingredients change anything? Presumably, your spoonful of fat will crisp-tender your 8 carbs of cruciferous vegetables to a perfect turn. If not, you’re not doing it right. Other than throwing part of the food away, nothing people ordinarily do in kitchens (except for the microbeasties part, above) will affect basic nutritional values. Martin 215/167/165 since April 2004 — Martin Golding | I cook, therefore I am. You eat. DoD #236 BMWMOA #55952 SMTC #2 | What’s THAT supposed to prove?
Response:
Homebrewing is NOT regulated by states. The Fed handles the manufacture, regulation and labeling of alcohol-based products.
Interesting. I’d thought the XXIst Amendment put the authority to regular alcohol to the states and the only reason the Fed was involved was taxation. But I just read the exact text of the XXIst and it says no such thing. It only says that states get to forbid alcoholic beverages if they wish. One person can brew up to 100 gallons. A family, no more than 200. Doesn’t matter what state your in. You can thank Jimmy Carter for allowing homebrewing.
When I was a kid before the Carter administration, New York State allowed 300 gallons annually by a family. That’s a vast amount. I’ve brewed a few times but I’m not sure I’ve ever done more than 2 gallons in any one year. I didn’t know the Fed had set a nationwide standard but it makes sense that they would have eventually gotten around to it. So homebrewing is now regulated by the Fed and has been since the Carter administration. Thanks for the eductional experience.
Response:
Not all fiber is "roughage." I still don’t get why they’d call pectin "fiber," but that’s how it’s labeled and described by FDA and USDA. It’s a "soluble fiber" as opposed to the bulk that is roughage.
Isn’t it just a problem with the word? That is, ‘fiber’ sounds thready in nature, and we think of it as not dissolving. But fiber is actually just what isn’t absorbed out of your intestine, so it’s not peculiar that pectin is fiber. Or have I got it wrong again? Chakolate — The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the right place but to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment. –Dorothy Nevill
Response:
Not all fiber is "roughage." I still don’t get why they’d call pectin "fiber," but that’s how it’s labeled and described by FDA and USDA. It’s a "soluble fiber" as opposed to the bulk that is roughage. Isn’t it just a problem with the word? That is, ‘fiber’ sounds thready in nature, and we think of it as not dissolving. But fiber is actually just what isn’t absorbed out of your intestine, so it’s not peculiar that pectin is fiber.
Agreed. The choice of the word "fiber" is bizzare. But consider: Threads like cotton are made of bonded sugars. Most natural fibers are made of indigestible cellulose variants.
Response:
Sec. 25.205 Production (a) Any adult may produce beer, without payment of tax, for personal or family use and not for sale. An adult is any individual who is 18 years of age or older. If the locality in which the household is located requires a greater minimum age for the sale of beer to individuals, the adult shall be that age before commencing the production of beer. This exemption does not authorize the production of beer for use contrary to state or local law. (b) The production of beer per household, without payment of tax, for personal or family use may not exceed: (1) 200 gallons per calendar year if there are two or more adults residing in the household, or (2) 100 gallons per calendar year if there is only one adult residing in the household. (c) Partnerships except as provided in Sec. 25.207, corporations or associations may not produce beer, without payment of tax, for personal or family use. (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1334, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5053)) From the Alcohol Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (formerly the Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms)
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Homebrewing is NOT regulated by states. The Fed handles the manufacture, regulation and labeling of alcohol-based products. Interesting. I’d thought the XXIst Amendment put the authority to regular alcohol to the states and the only reason the Fed was involved was taxation. But I just read the exact text of the XXIst and it says no such thing. It only says that states get to forbid alcoholic beverages if they wish. One person can brew up to 100 gallons. A family, no more than 200. Doesn’t matter what state your in. You can thank Jimmy Carter for allowing homebrewing. When I was a kid before the Carter administration, New York State allowed 300 gallons annually by a family. That’s a vast amount. I’ve brewed a few times but I’m not sure I’ve ever done more than 2 gallons in any one year. I didn’t know the Fed had set a nationwide standard but it makes sense that they would have eventually gotten around to it. So homebrewing is now regulated by the Fed and has been since the Carter administration. Thanks for the eductional experience.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Sec. 25.205 Production (a) Any adult may produce beer, without payment of tax, for personal or family use and not for sale. An adult is any individual who is 18 years of age or older. If the locality in which the household is located requires a greater minimum age for the sale of beer to individuals, the adult shall be that age before commencing the production of beer. This exemption does not authorize the production of beer for use contrary to state or local law. (b) The production of beer per household, without payment of tax, for personal or family use may not exceed: (1) 200 gallons per calendar year if there are two or more adults residing in the household, or (2) 100 gallons per calendar year if there is only one adult residing in the household. (c) Partnerships except as provided in Sec. 25.207, corporations or associations may not produce beer, without payment of tax, for personal or family use. (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1334, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5053)) From the Alcohol Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (formerly the Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms)
So, can the 18 year old drink the stuff? Is this a way around the 21 year old requirement for buying beer? — Bob in CT
Response:
The drinking age is a state matter. The Fed’s just worry about getting their fair share of possible revenues. The states can contend with the "particulars." – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Sec. 25.205 Production (a) Any adult may produce beer, without payment of tax, for personal or family use and not for sale. An adult is any individual who is 18 years of age or older. If the locality in which the household is located requires a greater minimum age for the sale of beer to individuals, the adult shall be that age before commencing the production of beer. This exemption does not authorize the production of beer for use contrary to state or local law. (b) The production of beer per household, without payment of tax, for personal or family use may not exceed: (1) 200 gallons per calendar year if there are two or more adults residing in the household, or (2) 100 gallons per calendar year if there is only one adult residing in the household. (c) Partnerships except as provided in Sec. 25.207, corporations or associations may not produce beer, without payment of tax, for personal or family use. (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1334, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5053)) From the Alcohol Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (formerly the Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms) So, can the 18 year old drink the stuff? Is this a way around the 21 year old requirement for buying beer? — Bob in CT
Response:
| I know Adkins considers a carb a carb, no matter if a complex carb or | simple carb. However, | if you combine and cook the carbs, does it alter | them? NO In other words if you have 4 carbs from one ingredient and 4 carbs | from another ingredient, does it indeed equal 8 carbs YES or do other things happen. NO Do the fat or protein grams ever convert themselves to carbs? NO | If I have 8 carbs and 4 fat grams will combining and cooking the | ingredients change anything? NO | Thanks, | Anon — Peter website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo
Response: